![]() ![]() Look through the limited fork as through an adjustable, adaptable, flexible lens. There are obvious blindspots: the tines themselves and/or spaces between tines. ACHIEVEMENT GAP TINE This is useful. This is a reminder that information, perception, tools used to understand and discover are not yet infallible, are not yet capable of capturing everything or the entirety of anything only versions, possibilities that may be true, restricted truths, in the contexts of the encounters, observations, participations and exchanges. Shifting (any part of) the limited fork lens system exposes, creates, activates other configurations
(just as plausible, just as incomplete). This adjustable, adaptable, flexible lens system also emphasizes the temporary nature, and possible beautiful nature, possible ugly nature of things, for the flexibility, adaptability, and adjustability is kaleidoscopic, and what is forked ![]() Think (just for now) of a framing system as outlines of petals of a rose (system).
Rose refers to structures that are arrangements and configurations of a set of petals, a group of frames; a frame that frames a group of frames. Each petal is a framing system. The frames in the group need not be identical. An arriving insect enters a frame of petal, alters a frameof petal, extends a frame of petal, may interact with multiple frames. This rose multiverse (each petal a universe, connected yet different) can fold compactly, universes in nutshells, in a single atom so to speak, a rosebush as a frame of rose multiverses, a rose garden as a frame of rosebush multiverses and realities. And the rosebush system can unfold, can blossom, revealing more realities inside realities inside realitites.
![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License
|
What would/could happen if you frame what think you know differently? packaged it differently or even tried WHAT IS FRAMED TENDS ALSO TO FRAME; WHAT FRAMES TENDS ALSO TO BE FRAMED (on some scale What is the nature of the framing system (in use in a certain context? In another)? What are the properties of the framing system? —How do you know this? Which framing systems of knowing are you using? How consistent? How variable? is the framing system? What is the source of the framing system? Why do you use it? Did you search for and choose it? What are boundaries of the frame? Is the frame universal? What is the range of effectiveness of the framing system? Is the frame visible? Under which circumstances? When is the frame not visible? How important is visibility/invisibility of the frame? Does it shape what occurs within it? What shapes it? What are limits of what the frame can be made to do, can be made to become? Is the frame part of what is framed all the time? any time? On what scale(s)? In which location(s)? when the frame is activated? How does the frame frame? How many ways can you find to frame what you experience? How is frame validity determined? Is it possible to have framelessness? How to accomplish framelessness? How are you defining framelessness? Is that definition also a frame? What are purposes of the/a frame? How many kinds of framing systems do you use? Are you part of? How many can you shuffle? What does it mean to shuffle frames? to juggle frames? to break frames? reassemble frames recycle frames? When what is framed is magnified, what happens to the frame? When what is framed shrinks, what happens to the frame? What is the frame's role in magnification or shrinkage or apparent unchanging status of what is framed? Is the frame controlling? controlled? What happens/ can happen when frames interact? And when a frame is framed? How are frames constructed? How durable are types of frames? Are some framing systems aesthetically appealing? Is an aesthetically appealing (a type of framing system, by the way) framing system, EXPLAIN (that is: frame your response[s]) |



